I want to make a general call for measurements of Or am I only a amateurish voodoo analyst?! Perhaps the bad angle …well one of the many reasons, The ice around the very North Pole refuse to melt is Ice…voodoo science…Lustmord…The reason why the #110 Gunnar, good to see your posts here in the pack Temp=!is.na(daily$ice) N=max(daily$julian)-min(daily$julian)+1 Names(daily)=c(“month”,”day”,”year”,”ice”)ĭaily$date< -as.Date(paste(daily$year,daily$month,daily$day,sep="-"))ĭaily$julian<-julian(daily$date,start="")ĭaily$dd=as.numeric(as.character(daily$dd)) #AMSR-E sea ice concentration algorism developed by Dr. If this still doesn’t make you feel any more optimistic, then try checking out the following comparison between today’s polar ice and the same day in 1990:įor refresher, here’s the script that I use to collate: Once you get past mid-August the melt rates slow very significantly: to illustrate this think of how 2007 lost its final 3 million km/sĠ9,16,2007,4267656 i.e. We would then be between 13 and 14 days behind 2007 at 2007 melt rates. At the moment there is very little to choose between the rates, both averaging very close to -100,000 km/2 per day in the last 4 days.īut let’s imagine that the gap is closed from the current -880,000 km/2 to say -750,000 km/2 by Aug 5th Therefore, taking 2007 rates as a benchmark we are 11 days behindĮxcept that of course we need to exceed 2007 rates to catch up. If you look at 2007 it took 11 days from now to lose a further 880,000 km/2 Here comes the ice baby! (As opposed to, there goes the baby ice … nyuk, nyuk, nyuk). The arctic is cooling earlier this year than it did last year. LOWS NEAR 35.Īlso, Anchorage reported a record low maximum temp yesterday. EAST WINDS 20 TOĢ5 MPH BECOMING SOUTH 10 TO 20 MPH AFTER MIDNIGHT.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |